September 1982
280 p., 6 1/8 x 9 1/4
1587, A Year of No Significance
The Ming Dynasty in Decline
- Ray Huang
《萬曆十五年》(1587, a Year of No Significance)是歷史學家黃仁宇最負盛名、也是體現其「大歷史觀」的一部明史研究專著。其著作主旨在書中末段看出:「當一個人口眾多的國家,各人行動全憑儒家簡單粗淺而又無法固定的原則所限制,而法律又缺乏創造性,則其社會發展的程度,必然受到限制。即便是宗旨善良,也不能補助技術之不及。」
台北:食貨出版社 1991 十四版
一般史家以為是明朝滅亡的起點,如萬曆十年(1582年)張居正去世,萬曆二十年(1592年)援朝鮮之戰,萬曆三十一年間的「妖書案」,接下來萬曆四十三年(1615年)起的「三大案」(梃擊案、紅丸案、移宮案),萬曆四十七年(1619年)的薩爾滸之敗等。與這些年份相比,萬曆十五年(1587年)雖然有海瑞、戚繼光的去世,但終究只是無足輕重的一年,也即如其英文版的書名:無關緊要的1587年(1587,A Year of No Significance)。
但黃仁宇提出與其他史學者不同的看法,指出此一年似是無重大動盪,實際上可能卻是明朝發展至盡頭而步向滅亡的一年。黃仁宇引用典籍,特別是《神宗實錄》,就此年中發生的立儲之爭和一連串使萬曆帝感到大為不快的問題作分析,研究發生在萬曆帝身上的變化。黃仁宇指出,雖然最後萬曆帝在種種問題上妥協,但他由此怠政三十三年,可能是他對抗無效之後,對文官集團的一種報復方式。由此可以理解,明朝的皇帝表面看是有其無限權力,但終歸也要受到傳統文化和文官集團的制肘。
另外書中還提到海瑞、戚繼光、李贄等 人,也是受到傳統文化的制肘,而得不到有意義的發展。對海瑞,黃仁宇形容「他雖然被人仰慕,但沒有人按照他的榜樣辦事,他的一生體現了一個有教養的讀書人 服務於公眾而犧牲自我的精神,但這種精神的實際作用卻至為微薄。」;對戚繼光,黃仁宇評「戚繼光的求實精神,表現於使革新不與傳統距離過遠。」;而對李 贄,黃仁宇也評說李贄不過是反映明朝在儒家倫理文化趨於僵化下,思想界的苦悶和困局。
[編輯] 出版概況
本書原寫作語言為英文,初稿成於1976年夏季。本書的出版曾遭遇「無數挫折」。英文稿在美國多家出版社輾轉,均因風格新異而不被接受。商業性質的出版社認為,本書雖然提及宮廷生活、妃嬪間恩怨,但又因海瑞而涉及明朝財政,因李贄而涉及中國思想,應屬於學術著作。而大學出版社則認為這書既不像斷代史,也不像專題論文,實在是不倫不類,也不願承印。只有耶魯大學出版社毅然排除成見,答應出版。1981年由耶魯大學出版社(Yale University Press)印行(ISBN 0300028849),並獲得美國國家書卷獎(American BookAwards)1982年和1983年歷史類好書兩次提名。簡體中文版於1982年5月由北京中華書局出版(250頁,ISBN 7-101-01491-7),由其好友廖沫沙題箋,印在封面。後來陶希聖很欣賞這本書,就在1985年6月其主持的臺北食貨出版社印行正體中文版(ISBN 957-8876-01-7),並為之寫讀後記附於書後。2006年,為紀念此書問世30周年,中華書局又重新校訂出版了簡體中文「增訂紀念版」。本書除中文外,亦被翻譯成法語、德語、日語出版。
[編輯] 內容敘事探討
歷史學家江政寬認 為《萬曆十五年》中,黃仁宇對人物的刻畫往往帶有一點心理史學的影子,在以往,人物的心思一向是文學家馳騁的領域,黃仁宇雖然去揣測人物的想法、動機等, 但不能意味這非歷史研究,因為黃仁宇的推論或想像皆有廣博的史料支撐,故應將之可視為「以文學手法撰成的歷史著作」。也因如此,冰冷的歷史在黃仁宇的筆下 生動的展現在讀者的眼前。不過黃仁宇的敘事體仍有其缺點:第一點、黃仁宇勾勒人物心思的筆法是經由「結果論」而產生的,因為歷史已經發生過,所以黃仁宇才 有能其推斷,這與心理學家所使用的方式不同,因此黃仁宇的推斷是否妥貼,還有待商榷。第二點、在歷史想像的部分黃仁宇用的是「肯定」的語句表達,因此人物 在無形中就被附加上了黃仁宇想像的性格,顯然太過武斷而不夠謹慎,可謂歷史想像發揮過了頭。黃仁宇在書成後,寄往劍橋。李約瑟看完後,寫信給他說:「哎呀,一切靠抽稅而轉移!」[1]
週末 重讀這本20年錢買的書 能夠讀當初未讀的 起居錄:附錄一/附錄二 相當有趣---其中 "生番"等是漢人用語
《萬曆十五年》(1587, a Year of No Significance)是歷史學家黃仁宇最負盛名、也是體現其「大歷史觀」的一部明史研究專著。其著作主旨在書中末段看出:「當一個人口眾多的國家,各人行動全憑儒家簡單粗淺而又無法固定的原則所限制,而法律又缺乏創造性,則其社會發展的程度,必然受到限制。即便是宗旨善良,也不能補助技術之不及。」
一般史家以為是明朝滅亡的起點,如萬曆十年(1582年)張居正去世,萬曆二十年(1592年)援朝鮮之戰,萬曆三十一年間的「妖書案」,接下來萬曆四十三年(1615年)起的「三大案」(梃擊案、紅丸案、移宮案),萬曆四十七年(1619年)的薩爾滸之敗等。與這些年份相比,萬曆十五年(1587年)雖然有海瑞、戚繼光的去世,但終究只是無足輕重的一年,也即如其英文版的書名:無關緊要的1587年(1587,A Year of No Significance)。
但黃仁宇提出與其他史學者不同的看法,指出此一年似是無重大動盪,實際上可能卻是明朝發展至盡頭而步向滅亡的一年。黃仁宇引用典籍,特別是《神宗實錄》,就此年中發生的立儲之爭和一連串使萬曆帝感到大為不快的問題作分析,研究發生在萬曆帝身上的變化。黃仁宇指出,雖然最後萬曆帝在種種問題上妥協,但他由此怠政三十三年,可能是他對抗無效之後,對文官集團的一種報復方式。由此可以理解,明朝的皇帝表面看是有其無限權力,但終歸也要受到傳統文化和文官集團的制肘。
另外書中還提到海瑞、戚繼光、李贄等 人,也是受到傳統文化的制肘,而得不到有意義的發展。對海瑞,黃仁宇形容「他雖然被人仰慕,但沒有人按照他的榜樣辦事,他的一生體現了一個有教養的讀書人 服務於公眾而犧牲自我的精神,但這種精神的實際作用卻至為微薄。」;對戚繼光,黃仁宇評「戚繼光的求實精神,表現於使革新不與傳統距離過遠。」;而對李 贄,黃仁宇也評說李贄不過是反映明朝在儒家倫理文化趨於僵化下,思想界的苦悶和困局。
[编辑] 目錄
- 自序
- 第一章 萬曆皇帝
- 第二章 首輔申時行
- 第三章 世間已無張居正
- 第四章 活著的祖宗
- 第五章 海瑞——古怪的模範官僚
- 第六章 戚繼光——孤獨的將領
- 第七章 李贄——自相衝突的哲學家
- 附錄及後記
- 附錄一
- 附錄二
- 參考書目
- 《萬曆十五年》和我的大「歷」史觀
- 陶希聖讀後記
[编辑] 出版概況
本書原寫作語言為英文,初稿成於1976年夏季。本書的出版曾遭遇「無數挫折」。英文稿在美國多家出版社輾轉,均因風格新異而不被接受。商業性質的出版社認為,本書雖然提及宮廷生活、妃嬪間恩怨,但又因海瑞而涉及明朝財政,因李贄而涉及中國思想,應屬於學術著作。而大學出版社則認為這書既不像斷代史,也不像專題論文,實在是不倫不類,也不願承印。只有耶魯大學出版社毅然排除成見,答應出版。1981年由耶魯大學出版社(Yale University Press)印行(ISBN 0300028849),並獲得美國國家書卷獎(American BookAwards)1982年和1983年歷史類好書兩次提名。簡體中文版於1982年5月由北京中華書局出版(250頁,ISBN 7-101-01491-7),由其好友廖沫沙題箋,印在封面。後來陶希聖很欣賞這本書,就在1985年6月其主持的臺北食貨出版社印行正體中文版(ISBN 957-8876-01-7),並為之寫讀後記附於書後。2006年,為紀念此書問世30周年,中華書局又重新校訂出版了簡體中文「增訂紀念版」。本書除中文外,亦被翻譯成法語、德語、日語出版。
INTERESTING TIMES
By DAVID LATTIMORE; David Lattimore teaches Chinese at Brown University.
Published: June 21, 1981
1587 A Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline. By Ray Huang. Illustrated. 278 pp. New Haven: Yale University Press. $19.95.
IN Europe, 1588 was the year of the defeat of the Spanish Armada. This was an event of consequence, since it made England the champion of the Protestant countries and spoiled the Hapsburg scheme of restoring papal authority. In contrast, 1587 seems less noteworthy, although interesting things happened then too, such as the beheading of Mary, Queen of Scots, and Sir Francis Drake's spectacular raid on Cadiz.
But how do we judge what is consequential in history? To Ray Huang, in 1587 things were rather quiet at the eastern as well as the western end of the Old World. His unusual and thoughtful book is a portrait of China in that Year of the Pig, which he calls a ''year of no significance.'' But he means precisely to show us the significance of the insignificant. He takes the poet's or the novelist's joy in turning a commonplace detail to the angle at which it reveals its glint of meaning.
The year 1587 was the 220th of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644). The regime was declining but had not yet fallen. Earnest and learned men - generals and court eunuchs as well as Mandarin civil servants - were striving to hold things together, balancing the yang of public duty against the yin of ambiguously legitimate self-interest.
Three Prime Ministers had been executed at the beginning of the Ming, and after that the office remained vacant. The real heads of Government were the Grand Secretaries, although by law they were merely court scholars and drafters of documents. For a decade beginning in 1572, the First Grand Secretary, Zhang Juzheng (or Chang Chu-cheng, in the spelling used by Mr. Huang) had been virtually a dictator. He had repaired the Grand Canal, which carried rice from the south to the capital at Peking, and had tried to correct the tax registers, some of which were two centuries out of date. The boy Emperor Wan-li was brought up in awe of this apparently strict and frugal moralist, who was also his tutor; when Zhang died in 1582, posthumous revelations of his greed and vindictiveness seem to have traumatically disillusioned his former pupil.
The year 1587 was Wan-li's 15th. The first Grand Secretary was now the bland and conciliatory Shen Shixing (or Shen Shih-hsing). Although remembered in history as the do-nothing lieutenant of a donothing ruler, Shen was in fact dealing promptly and sensibly with some of the problems of the day. One of these was the silt-choked Yellow River, which then, as so often, was bursting its levees. There were two schools of thought about flood control. The conservatives in the court favored broadening the channel, while the radicals wanted to make it deeper and swifter so it could cleanse itself. In 1587 Shen was able to maneuver the politically difficult appointment of an expert in the latter, more difficult technique. In the same year, however, he managed less well another perennial problem, the northern nomads. A minor Tungusic klan, the Manchus, were forming alliances under the leadership of a hitherto unknown chief, Nurhaci. The Governor of the Northeast Territory wanted to stop this potentially dangerous accretion of ''barbarian'' power, but his efforts were frustrated by an underling. Each of these officials denounced the other to higher authorities, but the first Grand Secretary had the matter hushed up in the interests of amity, and Nurhaci was forgotten. (Less than 60 years later, his grandson succeeded the Ming as first Manchu Emperor of China.)
Rich men or effective and demanding men have always caused resentment and envy, and in China they have often been slandered to their superiors and exiled or worse. Two exceptional men who fell victim to this fate died in 1587. One of them was Qi Jikuang (or Ch'i Chi-k'uang), the most resourceful of the Ming generals. At a time when conventional forces had become nearly useless (because the military caste had gone to seed), Qi trained his own peasant army and drove off the so-called ''Japanese pirates'' (really a vast international force of smugglers and raiders of the coasts and rivers). The other victim was Hai Rui (or Hai Jui), the ''eccentric model official.'' Before his death, Hai had recently returned to office after 15 years in exile. Almost alone among Ming officials, Hai lived only on his salary, refusing graft. He died owning less than 20 ounces of silver. Before his exile Hai had been Governor of China's richest city, Soochow, where the gentry opposed his policy of restoring land to peasants who had lost it through mortgage foreclosure. Mr. Huang believes that Hai was interfering futilely with a ''natural'' process that allowed individuals to rise or fall in social class, while the classes themselves remained stable. (A different view is held by modern historians in China, including Wu Han, whose articles and a Peking opera recounting Hai's criticism of the Emperor are claimed to have implied criticism of Mao Zedong. The Maoist retaliation against Wu Han in 1965 and 1966 was in fact the opening salvo of the Cultural Revolution.)
There is one event of this time that Mr. Huang has inadequately acknowledged. From 1586 to 1588, China suffered one of the two worst epidemics of its history, with a fall in population perhaps exceeding 20 percent. Loss of life on this scale is scarcely of ''no significance.'' The identity of the disease has never been established. Epidemics are little reported in the historical texts, perhaps because one could only pray for them to end, whereas floods, being partly controllable, gave rise to disputes, with political repercussions, over methods of control - methods requiring tens of thousands of conscript laborers.
Perhaps the most interesting events of 1587 were taking place inside two tortured minds. One was that of Li Zhi (or Li Chih), the most brilliant and impassioned of Ming philosophers. After the rationalism and objectivism of the Sung dynasty (960-1279), Chinese philosophy, like Chinese society, had turned inward in Ming times. For the members of the dominant Wang Yang-ming school, ''innate knowledge'' always confirmed Confucian (and sometimes Buddhist or Taoist) moral tenets. But Mr. Huang believes that in 1587 Li Zhi, who had followed the idealism of Yang-ming, was beginning to see that the inner light might just as well lead one to a complete spontaneity and libertinism. After all, if the external world were unreal, were not virtue and vice equally unreal? By 1587 Li had quit the Mandarinate, broken with his closest friend, dismissed his wife and only surviving child. The next year he would shave his head and enter a Buddhist monastery - without, however, taking monastic vows or relinquishing his Mandarin beard. Yet to come were his greatest works, the ''Book To Be Hidden'' and the ''Book To Be Burned.'' Fifteen years later (not 25, as Mr. Huang twice states) Li was to die a suicide in prison, having neither sought nor found a following.
The other tortured mind was that of the Emperor himself. In his teens, the lonely, weak-willed Wan-li had fallen in love with a 14-year-old concubine surnamed Zheng (or Cheng), who bore his second surviving son, shared his religious and literary interests, and dominated the remainder of his 48-year reign. Wan-li wanted to make the younger son his heir, but could not bring himself to displace the first-born, a child of his mother's maid-in-waiting. The Emperor's indecision led to one of the longest, most damaging episodes of passive-aggressive behavior in history. A dozen years passed before he would commence the older boy's education, 20 years before he would acknowledge him as heir and permit his marriage, another dozen years before the younger son was sent, as was proper, to a provincial fiefdom. Beginning noticeably in 1587, Wan-li neglected the supposedly compulsory pre-dawn audiences and the lectures of his tutors. Slowly he ceased to govern, to answer memorials or letters of resignation, to refill posts or make decisions. The regime was gradually grinding to a halt.
In Mr. Huang's view, Wan-li was not simply a weak ruler in a job requiring a strong one. The throne itself had become overly controlled by officials who subjected the ruler's every moment to the pressure of moralistic scrutiny and the paralyzing boredom of ritual. Wan-li's psychosis was a kind of rebellion that, in its negative way, showed great tenacity of will. Hai Rui, the ''eccentric model official,'' had substituted morality for law. So had Wan-li's tutors. Wan-li's withdrawal was an irrational but effective defense against the moral and ritual constraints that governed in place of the law, in Ming as in modern China.
Illustrations: drawing of an oriental vase with a plant
But how do we judge what is consequential in history? To Ray Huang, in 1587 things were rather quiet at the eastern as well as the western end of the Old World. His unusual and thoughtful book is a portrait of China in that Year of the Pig, which he calls a ''year of no significance.'' But he means precisely to show us the significance of the insignificant. He takes the poet's or the novelist's joy in turning a commonplace detail to the angle at which it reveals its glint of meaning.
The year 1587 was the 220th of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644). The regime was declining but had not yet fallen. Earnest and learned men - generals and court eunuchs as well as Mandarin civil servants - were striving to hold things together, balancing the yang of public duty against the yin of ambiguously legitimate self-interest.
Three Prime Ministers had been executed at the beginning of the Ming, and after that the office remained vacant. The real heads of Government were the Grand Secretaries, although by law they were merely court scholars and drafters of documents. For a decade beginning in 1572, the First Grand Secretary, Zhang Juzheng (or Chang Chu-cheng, in the spelling used by Mr. Huang) had been virtually a dictator. He had repaired the Grand Canal, which carried rice from the south to the capital at Peking, and had tried to correct the tax registers, some of which were two centuries out of date. The boy Emperor Wan-li was brought up in awe of this apparently strict and frugal moralist, who was also his tutor; when Zhang died in 1582, posthumous revelations of his greed and vindictiveness seem to have traumatically disillusioned his former pupil.
The year 1587 was Wan-li's 15th. The first Grand Secretary was now the bland and conciliatory Shen Shixing (or Shen Shih-hsing). Although remembered in history as the do-nothing lieutenant of a donothing ruler, Shen was in fact dealing promptly and sensibly with some of the problems of the day. One of these was the silt-choked Yellow River, which then, as so often, was bursting its levees. There were two schools of thought about flood control. The conservatives in the court favored broadening the channel, while the radicals wanted to make it deeper and swifter so it could cleanse itself. In 1587 Shen was able to maneuver the politically difficult appointment of an expert in the latter, more difficult technique. In the same year, however, he managed less well another perennial problem, the northern nomads. A minor Tungusic klan, the Manchus, were forming alliances under the leadership of a hitherto unknown chief, Nurhaci. The Governor of the Northeast Territory wanted to stop this potentially dangerous accretion of ''barbarian'' power, but his efforts were frustrated by an underling. Each of these officials denounced the other to higher authorities, but the first Grand Secretary had the matter hushed up in the interests of amity, and Nurhaci was forgotten. (Less than 60 years later, his grandson succeeded the Ming as first Manchu Emperor of China.)
Rich men or effective and demanding men have always caused resentment and envy, and in China they have often been slandered to their superiors and exiled or worse. Two exceptional men who fell victim to this fate died in 1587. One of them was Qi Jikuang (or Ch'i Chi-k'uang), the most resourceful of the Ming generals. At a time when conventional forces had become nearly useless (because the military caste had gone to seed), Qi trained his own peasant army and drove off the so-called ''Japanese pirates'' (really a vast international force of smugglers and raiders of the coasts and rivers). The other victim was Hai Rui (or Hai Jui), the ''eccentric model official.'' Before his death, Hai had recently returned to office after 15 years in exile. Almost alone among Ming officials, Hai lived only on his salary, refusing graft. He died owning less than 20 ounces of silver. Before his exile Hai had been Governor of China's richest city, Soochow, where the gentry opposed his policy of restoring land to peasants who had lost it through mortgage foreclosure. Mr. Huang believes that Hai was interfering futilely with a ''natural'' process that allowed individuals to rise or fall in social class, while the classes themselves remained stable. (A different view is held by modern historians in China, including Wu Han, whose articles and a Peking opera recounting Hai's criticism of the Emperor are claimed to have implied criticism of Mao Zedong. The Maoist retaliation against Wu Han in 1965 and 1966 was in fact the opening salvo of the Cultural Revolution.)
There is one event of this time that Mr. Huang has inadequately acknowledged. From 1586 to 1588, China suffered one of the two worst epidemics of its history, with a fall in population perhaps exceeding 20 percent. Loss of life on this scale is scarcely of ''no significance.'' The identity of the disease has never been established. Epidemics are little reported in the historical texts, perhaps because one could only pray for them to end, whereas floods, being partly controllable, gave rise to disputes, with political repercussions, over methods of control - methods requiring tens of thousands of conscript laborers.
Perhaps the most interesting events of 1587 were taking place inside two tortured minds. One was that of Li Zhi (or Li Chih), the most brilliant and impassioned of Ming philosophers. After the rationalism and objectivism of the Sung dynasty (960-1279), Chinese philosophy, like Chinese society, had turned inward in Ming times. For the members of the dominant Wang Yang-ming school, ''innate knowledge'' always confirmed Confucian (and sometimes Buddhist or Taoist) moral tenets. But Mr. Huang believes that in 1587 Li Zhi, who had followed the idealism of Yang-ming, was beginning to see that the inner light might just as well lead one to a complete spontaneity and libertinism. After all, if the external world were unreal, were not virtue and vice equally unreal? By 1587 Li had quit the Mandarinate, broken with his closest friend, dismissed his wife and only surviving child. The next year he would shave his head and enter a Buddhist monastery - without, however, taking monastic vows or relinquishing his Mandarin beard. Yet to come were his greatest works, the ''Book To Be Hidden'' and the ''Book To Be Burned.'' Fifteen years later (not 25, as Mr. Huang twice states) Li was to die a suicide in prison, having neither sought nor found a following.
The other tortured mind was that of the Emperor himself. In his teens, the lonely, weak-willed Wan-li had fallen in love with a 14-year-old concubine surnamed Zheng (or Cheng), who bore his second surviving son, shared his religious and literary interests, and dominated the remainder of his 48-year reign. Wan-li wanted to make the younger son his heir, but could not bring himself to displace the first-born, a child of his mother's maid-in-waiting. The Emperor's indecision led to one of the longest, most damaging episodes of passive-aggressive behavior in history. A dozen years passed before he would commence the older boy's education, 20 years before he would acknowledge him as heir and permit his marriage, another dozen years before the younger son was sent, as was proper, to a provincial fiefdom. Beginning noticeably in 1587, Wan-li neglected the supposedly compulsory pre-dawn audiences and the lectures of his tutors. Slowly he ceased to govern, to answer memorials or letters of resignation, to refill posts or make decisions. The regime was gradually grinding to a halt.
In Mr. Huang's view, Wan-li was not simply a weak ruler in a job requiring a strong one. The throne itself had become overly controlled by officials who subjected the ruler's every moment to the pressure of moralistic scrutiny and the paralyzing boredom of ritual. Wan-li's psychosis was a kind of rebellion that, in its negative way, showed great tenacity of will. Hai Rui, the ''eccentric model official,'' had substituted morality for law. So had Wan-li's tutors. Wan-li's withdrawal was an irrational but effective defense against the moral and ritual constraints that governed in place of the law, in Ming as in modern China.
Illustrations: drawing of an oriental vase with a plant
黃仁宇(英文名:Ray Huang,1918年-2000年1月8日),湖南長沙人,曾從戎於第二次世界大戰和動員戡亂期間的國軍,後赴美求學,密西根大學歷史博士,以歷史學家、中國歷史明史專家,「大歷史觀」的倡導者之名而為世人所知。著有《萬曆十五年》等暢銷書。
......「大歷史」(macrohistory)理論認為,時代之走向及發展狀況,是由無數社會和物質上的各種因素共同堆積起來的,歷史舞台上的某一「關鍵 角色」往往只是一個「角色」,讓任何人來扮演都可以,為眾人所熟知的著名歷史人物只是正好在那個時間踏上了舞台,坐上了歷史早準備好的空缺「角色」席。在 其作《中國大歷史》一書中這一觀點尤為鮮明,謂中國版圖架構的形成,「當中無可避免有其地理歷史因素在,有二千哩容易被人侵犯的地方,中國不得不構成一體……」
[编辑] 著作
- 《緬北之戰》,上海:大東書局,1946;臺北:聯經,2006.4,195頁,ISBN 957-08-3001-8
- The Grand Canal during the Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644. (Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Michigan,1964) Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms International, 1983
- 張皓、張升譯,《明代的漕運》,北京:新星,2005.4,270頁,ISBN 7-80148-767-2;臺北:聯經,2006
- Fiscal administration during the Ming dynasty. Columbia University Press, 1969
- Taxation and Governmental Finance in Sixteenth Century Ming China. London: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1974. 385 pp. ISBN 0-521-20283-3
- 阿風、許文繼、倪玉平、徐衛東譯,《十六世紀明代中國之財政與稅收》,臺北:聯經,2001.1,410 頁,ISBN 957-08-2192-2
- 1587, A Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline. New Haven & London: Yale UniversityPress, 1981. 278 pp. ISBN 0-300-02518-1
- 《萬曆十五年》,北京:中華書局,1982.5,250頁;臺北:食貨,1985.6(食貨出版,聯經總經銷,1994),289 頁,ISBN 957-8876-01-7
- Broadening the Horizons of Chinese History. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1987. 274 pp. ISBN 0-7656-0348-95
- 《放寬歷史的視界》,臺北:允晨,1988.7,294 頁,ISBN 957-0329-01-7;"新世紀增訂版",臺北:允晨,1999.10,380 頁,ISBN 957-0329-01-7
- 《赫遜河畔談中國歷史》,臺北:時報,1989.10,324 頁,ISBN 957-13-0046-2
- 宋碧雲譯,《長沙白茉莉》(White Jasmin of Changsha)(小說,以筆名李尉昂發表),臺北:時報,1 9 9 0,3 9 2 頁,ISBN 9-5-7-1 3-0 0 9 7-7;臺北:商務,1998,308 頁,ISBN 957-05-1501-5
- 《地北天南敘古今》,臺北:時報,1991,316 頁,ISBN 957-13-0352-6
- 《資本主義與廿一世紀》,臺北:聯經,1991.11,529 頁,ISBN 957-08-0713-X, 957-08-0714-8
- 《現代中國的歷程》(與勞思光、金耀基、戴國煇、高希均等合著),臺北:華視,1 9 9 2,2 2 2頁,ISBN 957-572-030-X
- China: A Macro History. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1988. 277 pp. ISBN 0-87332-452-8
- 《中國大歷史》,臺北:聯經,1993,368 頁,ISBN 957-08-1068-8
- 《從大歷史的角度讀蔣介石日記》,臺北:時報,1993,447 頁,ISBN 957-13-0962-1
- 《近代中國的出路》,臺北:聯經,1995.4,167 頁,ISBN 957-08-1355-5
- 《汴京殘夢》(小說,以筆名李尉昂發表),臺北:聯經,1997,239 頁,ISBN 957-08-1749-6
- 《新時代的歷史觀:西學為體,中學為用》,臺北:商務,1998,100 頁,ISBN 957-05-1434-5
- 《關係千萬重》,臺北:時報,1998,284 頁,ISBN 957-13-2751-4
- 張逸安譯,《黃河青山:黃仁宇回憶錄》(Yellow River and Blue Mountains),臺北:聯經,2001.1,615 頁,ISBN 957-08-2193-0
- 《大歷史不會萎縮》,臺北:聯經,2004.9,474 頁,ISBN 957-08-2763-7
- 《黃仁宇書信集》,北京:新星,2006
- China is not a Mystery 《中國並不神秘》,1974(沒有出版)
- 資本主義與二十一世紀
週末時,這裡像一座空城,銀行家們消失了,它變成了時髦年輕人的約會之地,他們喜歡這些落地玻璃窗的餐廳,他們在這裡展示自己,熱衷於被別人觀看。我有時 會坐在靠窗的座位上發呆,不知為何,這片區域經常讓我想起黃仁宇對於國民黨軍隊的描述。黃仁宇說那些先進的美式裝備像是異質的力量,它壓垮了那些中國軍 隊。而眼前的金融街呢,比起那個被雜亂而喧鬧的人群所包圍的中國社會,它像是一幅超現實畫面,像是那些貧窮家庭在牆上所掛的洋房別墅的掛曆,他們附著在中 國社會的表層,誘惑著其餘的人們。 (中國)偽裝的盛世 (許知遠): 北京房價一年漲3倍的恐怖
沒有留言:
張貼留言