2016年6月23日 星期四

Stefan Zweig in exile: A European in Brazil; The Unhurried World of Pre-War Vienna




The Unhurried World of Pre-War Vienna
Author Stefan Zweig, who inspired Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel, recalls Austria at the dawn of the 20th century

Smithsonian Journeys Quarterly
May 18, 2016



The Unhurried World of Pre-War Vienna
Author Stefan Zweig, who inspired Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel, recalls Austria at the dawn of the 20th century



SMITHSONIAN JOURNEYS QUARTERLY
MAY 18, 2016
627 8 0 1 1 2 666
6278110666





Excerpted from Chapter 1: “The World of Security” from "The World of Yesterday" by Stefan Zweig, 1942.

One lived well and easily and without cares in that old Vienna, and the Germans in the North looked with some annoyance and scorn upon their neighbors on the Danube who, instead of being “proficient” and maintaining rigid order, permitted themselves to enjoy life, ate well, took pleasure in feasts and theaters and, besides, made excellent music. Instead of German “proficiency,” which after all has embittered and disturbed the existence of all other peoples, and the forward chase and the greedy desire to get ahead of all others, in Vienna one loved to chat, cultivated a harmonious association, and lightheartedly and perhaps with lax conciliation permitted each one his share without envy. “Live and let live” was the famous Viennese motto, which today still seems to me to be more humane than all the categorical imperatives, and it maintained itself throughout all classes. Rich and poor, Czechs and Germans, Jews and Christians, lived peaceably together in spite of occasional chafing, and even the political and social movements were free of the terrible hatred which has penetrated the arteries of our time as a poisonous residue of the First World War. In the old Austria they still strove chivalrously, they abused each other in the news and in the parliament, but at the conclusion of their Ciceronian tirades, the selfsame representatives sat down together in friendship with a glass of beer or a cup of coffee and called each other [the familar] Du. Even when [Karl] Lueger, the leader of the anti-Semitic party, became mayor of the city, no change occurred in private affairs, and I personally must confess that neither in school nor at the university, nor in the world of literature, have I ever experienced the slightest suppression or indignity as a Jew. The hatred of country for country, of nation for nation, of one table for another, did not yet jump at one daily from the newspaper, it did not divide people from people and nations from nations; not yet had every herd and mass feeling become so disgustingly powerful in public life as today. Freedom in one’s private affairs, which is no longer considered comprehensible, was taken for granted. One did not look down upon tolerance as one does today as weakness and softness, but rather praised it as an ethical force.

For it was not a century of suffering in which I was born and educated. It was an ordered world with definite classes and calm transitions, a world without haste. The rhythm of the new speed had not yet carried over from the machines, the automobile, the telephone, the radio, and the airplane, to mankind; time and age had another measure. One lived more comfortably, and when I try to recall to mind the figures of the grown-ups who stood about my childhood, I am struck with the fact that many of them were corpulent at an early age. My father, my uncle, my teacher, the salesmen in the shops, the members of the Philharmonic at their music stands were already, at forty, portly and “worthy” men. They walked slowly, they spoke with measured accent, and, in their conversation, stroked their well-kept beards, which often had already turned gray. But gray hair was merely a new sign of dignity, and a “sedate” man consciously avoided the gestures and high spirits of youth as being unseemly. Even in my earliest childhood, when my father was not yet 40, I cannot recall ever having seen him run up or down stairs, or even doing anything in a visibly hasty fashion. Speed was not only thought to be unrefined, but indeed was considered unnecessary, for in that stabilized bourgeois world with its countless little securities, well palisaded on all sides, nothing unexpected ever occurred. Such catastrophes as took place outside on the world’s periphery never made their way through the well-padded walls of “secure” living. The Boer War, the Russo-Japanese War, the Balkan War itself did not penetrate the existence of my parents. They passed over all reports of war in the newspapers just as they did the sporting page. And truly, what did it matter to them what took place outside of Austria...? In their Austria in that tranquil epoch, there were no state revolutions, no crass destruction of values; if stocks sank four or five points on the exchange, it was called a “crash” and they talked earnestly, with furrowed brows, about the “catastrophe.” One complained more as a habit than because of actual conviction about the “high” taxes, which de facto, in comparison with those of the postwar period, were nothing other than small tips to the state. Exact stipulations were set down in testaments, to guard grandchildren and great-grandchildren against the loss of their fortunes, as if security were guaranteed by some invisible promissory note by the eternal powers. Meanwhile one lived comfortably and stroked one’s petty cares as if they were faithful, obedient pets of whom one was not in the least afraid. That is why, when chance places an old newspaper of those days in my hands and I read the excited articles about some little community election, when I try to recall the plays in the Burgtheater with their tiny problems, or the disproportionate excitement of our youthful discussions about things that were so terribly unimportant, I am forced to smile. How Lilliputian were all these cares, how wind-still the time! It had better luck, the generation of my parents and my grandparents, it lived quietly, straight and clearly from one end of its life to the other. But even so, I do not know if I envy them. How they remained blissfully unaware of all the bitter realities, of the tricks and forces of fate, how they lived apart from all those crises and problems that crush the heart but at the same time marvelously uplift it! How little they knew, as they muddled through in security and comfort and possessions, that life can also be tension and profusion, a continuous state of being surprised, and being lifted up from all sides; little did they think in their touching liberalism and optimism that each succeeding day that dawns outside our window can smash our life. Not even in their darkest nights was it possible for them to dream how dangerous man can be, or how much power he has to withstand dangers and overcome trials. We, who have been hounded through all the rapids of life, we who have been torn loose from all roots that held us, we, always beginning anew when we have been driven to the end, we, victims and yet willing servants of unknown, mystic forces, we, for whom comfort has become a saga and security a childhood dream, we have felt the tension from pole to pole and the eternal dread of the eternal new in every fiber of our being. Every hour of our years was bound up with “the world’s destiny.” Suffering and joyful, we have lived time and history far beyond our own little existence, while they, the older generation, were confined within themselves. Therefore each one of us, even the smallest of our generation, today knows a thousand times more about reality than the wisest of our ancestors. But nothing was given to us: we paid the price, fully and validly, for everything.








----
Some writers’ lives prove to be more enduring than their works. One of them is Stefan Zweig, born to Jewish parents in Vienna in 1881, whose short stories and historical biographies made him a literary celebrity. As the biopic "Vor der Morgenröte" shows, the rise of the Nazis drove him away from Europe, his "spiritual homeland"



A tender film chronicling a true Central European's tragic final years
ECON.ST



Biopics
Stefan Zweig in exile: A European in Brazil

Jun 22nd 2016, 15:39 BY A.B.C.

SOME writers’ lives—and deaths—prove to be more enduring than their works. One of them is Stefan Zweig, born to Jewish parents in Vienna in 1881, whose short stories and historical biographies made him a literary celebrity in Europe and beyond before the second world war. The rise of the Nazis, who banned his books, drove him into exile. Crushed by the destruction of Europe, his “spiritual homeland”, he eventually settled in Brazil, where he and his young wife committed suicide together in February 1942 by swallowing poison. These final years have inspired books such as French novelist Laurent Seksik’s "The Last Days" and German literary critic Volker Weidermann’s "Summer before the Dark", set in Ostend in 1936. Now they are revisited in a new film, "Vor der Morgenröte" ("Before the Dawn"), an Austrian-German-French production directed by Maria Schrader. Rather than a linear biopic, it is a nuanced meditation on exile.

Set entirely in the Americas, the film assumes a bit of knowledge of Zweig, jumping past the celebrity years and the horrors of Nazism, and focusing on couple’s final months in Petropolis, some 70km outside Rio de Janeiro. The Europe that Zweig eternalised in his memoirs, "The World of Yesterday: Memories of a European", is gone. In its place is Brazil, which Zweig calls “land of the future”. He marvels at how its diverse inhabitants live peacefully side by side; “it seems like a miracle to us, coming from Europe,” says his wife Lotte, played with a quiet dignity by Aenne Schwarz. Though primarily in German, the film flits between languages with the ease of a Central European intellectual. Rather than a practical afterthought, language documents the Zweigs’ exile; at first, they chat to locals in rudimentary Spanish, only gradually picking up the Portuguese phrases of their adopted homeland.

Where other directors might have fallen into stuffiness or despair, Ms Schrader’s film retains a lightness. This owes something to the casting of Josef Hader, an Austrian comedian known for his cabaret acts, as Zweig. Yet even the funny moments bear the imprint of exile. In a key scene, a mayor deep in the state of Bahia hosts a reception in Zweig’s honour. After the mayor’s speech, a brass band in uniform launches into a shaky rendition of “The Blue Danube” waltz. Zweig listens stunned, caught between laughter and tears. The pulsing Brazilian landscape, with its bright greens and men in linen suits, only accentuates the darkness left behind. The contrast can be seen during a quick trip to snowy New York in early 1941, shot in cold blues and whites. “For today my life is black enough,” says Zweig when offered coffee there, his mounting anguish compounded by his inability to respond to all the requests to help other Jews get out of Europe.

In these snapshots of life and death in exile, some things are deliberately left unsaid. There are no shots of burning books, marching soldiers or camp inmates, yet these cast a shadow throughout the film. Just as the Zweigs follow the horror in Europe from across the Atlantic, the director keeps her distance from her characters. This subtlety continues to the final scene, reflected in a bedroom mirror. In his suicide note, Zweig hoped that his friends would “live to see the dawn” (giving the film its title). Amid new uncertainty about the future of Europe, of which the Brexit referendum has been just one aspect, "Vor der Morgenröte" is a timely homage to a man who believed in it to the very end.







沒有留言:

網誌存檔